July 13, 2011

Dear Board and GM,

Regarding the sign changes:

I’m not sure why we need to go to the expense of new signage. Why not replace those that look tired and worn out? Since they need to be brown and white, the descriptions on the web site of the proposed signs are brown and yellowperhaps that is just the rendering. I am not in favor of a tag line ‘ where the tradition begins’

If we change the signage are we then going to change the logo on all the stationary and signage as was proposed a short time ago?

What will the cost be if we change the signage?

Since it is known that the signs need to be brown and white, why did we have a snow play sign this winter that was blue and why did I recently see a blue banner on Northwoods (TD property) that also was blue and white?

Bruce Brody